Michael Bay is attempting to induce cinema operators to meet spec with 3D projection — like using lamps that aren’t spent. I saw Bay and Cameron at Paramount on May 18 discussing 3D cinema projection and cinematography after showing clips of the new Transformers. We are talking about the big theater on the Paramount lot and it was the best 3D projection I have seen in months and Bay’s 3D work looked great.
The system there is the XPand shuttering eyewear system on a big screen but what was used was not a true product and serves only to highlight the problems of stereoscopic projection. In order to get decent brightness Paramount used two projectors and such a remedy is out of the question for neighborhood theaters. The eyewear dug into my nose — I was aware of them — but the ANSI image contrast is great and cross-talk is zilch.
I am bemused to recount that I was the leader of the design team that invented and manufactured the first IR linked shuttering eyewear, CrystalEyes. The XPand eyewear are a direct descendant of CE I, the original model with non-folding temples. They even use optically compensated pi-cells, which I also invented. The StereoGraphics product was $1,000 and although heavier and a bigger than the XPand eyewear they were more comfortable.
Paramount should put in a silver screen and use the RealD XL projection system. (I also helped to develop that but I have no interest in RealD.) That would be brighter than the XPand double projector contraption and use but one projector. Not sure the contrast would be as good, nor am I sure the cross-talk reduction would be as good, but on balance it would be a better experience with relatively unobtrusive eyewear. Paramount, I think, wants to keep on with a matte screen because of color balance issues and also because side-seats will suffer in image quality.