<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lenny Lipton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Stereoscopic Movies:  Conventional Wisdom by lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/stereoscopic-movies-conventional-wisdom/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>lennylipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I think the important point is that the breakdown of convergence and accomodation applies mostly to small screens viewed from up close, llike desktop monitors or TV sets, but does not apply when looking at big screens from the usual seating distances (with well shot footage projected).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the important point is that the breakdown of convergence and accomodation applies mostly to small screens viewed from up close, llike desktop monitors or TV sets, but does not apply when looking at big screens from the usual seating distances (with well shot footage projected).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/about/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>lennylipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your kind words.

There is room for a decent 35mm stereo 3D projection system becasue the digital proejctor diffusion is going more slowly than expected.  And it is going to be too costly an approach for many cinema opertors. Sadly the Technicolor adoption of the over/under system is not helpful in this context.  They have done nothing, as far as I know, about the major problems of the sytem:  It&#039;s not bright enough, it&#039;s easy to proejct pseudoscopically, and there is asymmertical corner darkening becasue of the intrinsic nature of lens coverage. It&#039;s a zombie foramt.  Bringing back the dead to kill the living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your kind words.</p>
<p>There is room for a decent 35mm stereo 3D projection system becasue the digital proejctor diffusion is going more slowly than expected.  And it is going to be too costly an approach for many cinema opertors. Sadly the Technicolor adoption of the over/under system is not helpful in this context.  They have done nothing, as far as I know, about the major problems of the sytem:  It&#8217;s not bright enough, it&#8217;s easy to proejct pseudoscopically, and there is asymmertical corner darkening becasue of the intrinsic nature of lens coverage. It&#8217;s a zombie foramt.  Bringing back the dead to kill the living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LIVE-ACTION STEREOSCOPIC FEATURES by lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/09/27/live-action-stereoscopic-features/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>lennylipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-206</guid>
		<description>We need cameras that are more convenient to use and more nearly resemble the kinds of cameras that DPs feel comfortable with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need cameras that are more convenient to use and more nearly resemble the kinds of cameras that DPs feel comfortable with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LIVE-ACTION STEREOSCOPIC FEATURES by lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/09/27/live-action-stereoscopic-features/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>lennylipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Looks like their announcement was premature.  Can&#039;t get an adequate interaxial separation, except for extreme closeups, out of one lens.  Also going to a high field rate with a single sensor just does not work becasue the iamges have to be captured essentially simultaneously. Electronic giants like Sony need to learn a lot more about stereo 3D before they can offer good products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like their announcement was premature.  Can&#8217;t get an adequate interaxial separation, except for extreme closeups, out of one lens.  Also going to a high field rate with a single sensor just does not work becasue the iamges have to be captured essentially simultaneously. Electronic giants like Sony need to learn a lot more about stereo 3D before they can offer good products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wrong, Wrong, Wrong:  Myths of Stereoscopic Filmmaking by lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/reality-check/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>lennylipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-204</guid>
		<description>You know I never noticed out of focus in Renaissance painting but it doesn&#039;t metter, it seems to me, whether the origin is painting or photography because this effect is simply not apparent in the visual world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I never noticed out of focus in Renaissance painting but it doesn&#8217;t metter, it seems to me, whether the origin is painting or photography because this effect is simply not apparent in the visual world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stereoscopic Composition by lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/02/15/stereoscopic-composition/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>lennylipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=170#comment-203</guid>
		<description>The CG people like Phil McNally at Dreamworks and Rob Engle at Sony have got it knocked.  They use multiple rigs or cameras throughout the shot to sculpt the various elements of the scene.  FredFred27 in LIve-Action has the right idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CG people like Phil McNally at Dreamworks and Rob Engle at Sony have got it knocked.  They use multiple rigs or cameras throughout the shot to sculpt the various elements of the scene.  FredFred27 in LIve-Action has the right idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SIDE-BY-SIDE FOREVER by lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/side-by-side-forever/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>lennylipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=293#comment-201</guid>
		<description>You know you are correct in most of what you say.  I honestly didn&#039;t know about the 20 times higher etc., but I do know you do see much better, much sharper with two eyes than one. 

Whatever is going on with muxing and demuxing for stereoplexing all of the various approaches I have seen lately produce similar results and the reduction in horizontal resolution is not apparent. Neither is there an apparent reduction in depth resolution.  I don&#039;t know why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know you are correct in most of what you say.  I honestly didn&#8217;t know about the 20 times higher etc., but I do know you do see much better, much sharper with two eyes than one. </p>
<p>Whatever is going on with muxing and demuxing for stereoplexing all of the various approaches I have seen lately produce similar results and the reduction in horizontal resolution is not apparent. Neither is there an apparent reduction in depth resolution.  I don&#8217;t know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LIVE-ACTION STEREOSCOPIC FEATURES by lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/09/27/live-action-stereoscopic-features/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>lennylipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Your idea is a good one and the concerns that lead to your solution make conversion from planar to stereo 3D attractive.

The discussion about non-Euclidean space representing how we preceive the visual world is intersting but I don&#039;t think this is currently a hot topic in psychology.  The position I now take is that the mind is a black box and stereo compostion is best determined empirically and subjectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your idea is a good one and the concerns that lead to your solution make conversion from planar to stereo 3D attractive.</p>
<p>The discussion about non-Euclidean space representing how we preceive the visual world is intersting but I don&#8217;t think this is currently a hot topic in psychology.  The position I now take is that the mind is a black box and stereo compostion is best determined empirically and subjectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thank you, Puff the Magic Dragon by lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/thank-you-puff-the-magic-dragon/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>lennylipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=201#comment-199</guid>
		<description>I was amazed when I visted Kuai and went to Honalei.  I had not heard of it when I wrote t he song but there it was -- obviously Puff&#039;s home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was amazed when I visted Kuai and went to Honalei.  I had not heard of it when I wrote t he song but there it was &#8212; obviously Puff&#8217;s home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thank you, Puff the Magic Dragon by ferret488</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/thank-you-puff-the-magic-dragon/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>ferret488</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=201#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Hi Lenny,

I&#039;m curious to know if you ever visited Kauai? I was just there. At the North Shore is a place, Hanalei, with both Beach and Caves. Also, they have a lot of coastal fog / mist there right now in the Fall.  :)

Thanks.

George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lenny,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to know if you ever visited Kauai? I was just there. At the North Shore is a place, Hanalei, with both Beach and Caves. Also, they have a lot of coastal fog / mist there right now in the Fall.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
