<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AVATAR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/avatar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/avatar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 05:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lennylipton</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/avatar/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lennylipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=309#comment-221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your insightful comment.  I think Cameron simply wanted to tell a good sci fi story and loves the technology of performance capture and 3D. Everything else is up to us to interpret -- because of what would have been otherwise formulaic fiction it is a surprisingly rich and complicated story a lot of which is told non-verbally. It&#039;s a fine piece of filmmaking and I am happy to have helped to develop the projection technology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your insightful comment.  I think Cameron simply wanted to tell a good sci fi story and loves the technology of performance capture and 3D. Everything else is up to us to interpret &#8212; because of what would have been otherwise formulaic fiction it is a surprisingly rich and complicated story a lot of which is told non-verbally. It&#8217;s a fine piece of filmmaking and I am happy to have helped to develop the projection technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachimonai</title>
		<link>http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/avatar/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rachimonai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lennylipton.wordpress.com/?p=309#comment-220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your wife&#039;s critiques are exactly right and they show how much more perceptive she is than are you.

   From the trailers I&#039;ve seen, this film is a piece of entertainment which, while pretending to be about a love-story is, instead, a subliminal work of self-referential pop-psychology in which we see the entertainment-media technology-culture glorify itself through its very favorite vehicles: dazzling and sanitized images of war, the presentation of nature and of non-High-technology cultures as idealist utopia, and, therefore, imaginary, unreal and impossibly vain hopes.

   As usual, proponents and apologists of the dominant High-technology culture, as represented in this film, are seen and heard to say, &quot;I need your help,&quot;  even as they are engaged in the systematic and violent destruction of an alien culture.  But, instead of recognizing ourselves and feeling real shame for what is an everyday aspect of modern society, the film invites us to simply objectify all that and reduce it to a simplistic morality play while the more subliminal messages soften up viewers---who&#039;d adamantly protest their being so susceptible---to an ever-growing alienation from all that is genuine and life-affirming.

    My poster-blurb for this film would run:

   A techno-warrior-glorification entertainment masquerading as a love-story and intended to mollify, distort and manipulate what&#039;s left of the critical faculties of an infantilized mass-entertainment culture.

   The viewer probably watches this film (repeatedly), stuffing the coffers of a major film studio, and never suspects that it&#039;s deeper irony is that it is he, the viewer, who is the object of a clever corporate act of dupery, and not the characters portrayed by actors, real or computer-generated, on the screen.   This is Hollywood&#039;s supreme specialty: subtly justifying itself and its attendant technology and the anti-social cultural forms which go with them while leaving the audience in a state of thumb-sucking satisfaction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your wife&#8217;s critiques are exactly right and they show how much more perceptive she is than are you.</p>
<p>   From the trailers I&#8217;ve seen, this film is a piece of entertainment which, while pretending to be about a love-story is, instead, a subliminal work of self-referential pop-psychology in which we see the entertainment-media technology-culture glorify itself through its very favorite vehicles: dazzling and sanitized images of war, the presentation of nature and of non-High-technology cultures as idealist utopia, and, therefore, imaginary, unreal and impossibly vain hopes.</p>
<p>   As usual, proponents and apologists of the dominant High-technology culture, as represented in this film, are seen and heard to say, &#8220;I need your help,&#8221;  even as they are engaged in the systematic and violent destruction of an alien culture.  But, instead of recognizing ourselves and feeling real shame for what is an everyday aspect of modern society, the film invites us to simply objectify all that and reduce it to a simplistic morality play while the more subliminal messages soften up viewers&#8212;who&#8217;d adamantly protest their being so susceptible&#8212;to an ever-growing alienation from all that is genuine and life-affirming.</p>
<p>    My poster-blurb for this film would run:</p>
<p>   A techno-warrior-glorification entertainment masquerading as a love-story and intended to mollify, distort and manipulate what&#8217;s left of the critical faculties of an infantilized mass-entertainment culture.</p>
<p>   The viewer probably watches this film (repeatedly), stuffing the coffers of a major film studio, and never suspects that it&#8217;s deeper irony is that it is he, the viewer, who is the object of a clever corporate act of dupery, and not the characters portrayed by actors, real or computer-generated, on the screen.   This is Hollywood&#8217;s supreme specialty: subtly justifying itself and its attendant technology and the anti-social cultural forms which go with them while leaving the audience in a state of thumb-sucking satisfaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
